Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Shaadi Aur tumse? Kabhi nahi


Therapeutic formulations using Marital Conflict and Child Psychopathology, as an example
Marital conflicts leads to child psychopathology is too simple an explanation.
What about those kids who's parents are violent and who are perfectly well adjusted when they grow up? Or alternately, those kids who's parent argue minimally, but who land up with difficulties because they catastrophize these arguments ? 
This makes it interesting to study the PROCESSES and the mechanisms that are involved to study marital conflicts.

For therapeutic formulations :
These are not simple diagrams with arrows. Unfortunately, we do this in the Indian setting during M.phil training. Simply look at the arrows and gauge the family processes involved, draw diagrams, and voila, the finished product.

Process-oriented research studies the mechanisms involved in the harmful effects of interpersonal conflict and the complex pathways toward child maladjustment. In other words, a study has to show robust evidence for the existence of each arrow that you draw and the effect sizes have to be convincing, while they can. This is the whole reason why we read books like Kazdin, to see the evidence base for studies.
Link : Kazdins book
Link : Process-oriented research
Here is an example of a model that I made, based on actual existing research evidence bases :

A Sample Model depicting parent and child depression using a few relationships between variables that have empirical evidence



1)      a : Depression in the mother can predict a genetic vulnerability in the child
2)      b : Depression in the mother can predict parenting behaviors like Rejection / Criticism or High Expressed Emotion
3)      c : A child's temperament is influenced by a depressed mother through genetic vulnerability
4)      e: Negative Parenting behaviors can predict Negative Schemas or belief systems in the child, moderated by the child's temperament (d)
5)      f : Negative Parenting behaviors can also predict lower interpersonal competence in the child
6)      g : A child's negative schemas influence his belief in his self-competence which in turn also influence his schema's, negatively
7)      h, k : Negative Schemas when mediated by stress exposure can lead to childhood depression
8)      i, k : A child with lower interpersonal competence when exposed to stress can develop childhood depression
9)      j, k : A child's temperament can predict depression in the child mediated by exposure to stress

So if we wish to study the mechanisms here (mediators, moderators, direct and indirect effects), we should be aware of what various theorists propose and show evidence for. (this is also why its important to study Statistics no matter how much you may dislike it :) 
Ref worth a read: Kraemer, Stice, Kazdin, Offord, Kupfer  “How Do Risk Factors Work Together? Mediators, Moderators, and Independent, Overlapping, and Proxy Risk Factors” Am J Psychiatry 2001; 158:848–856

1.      Exposure to conflict – Impacts child's security needs – this in turn impacts the child's adjustment (Cummings & Cummings, 1988, 1994)
Online ref:  http://www.psych.rochester.edu/graduate/developmental/faculty/documents/MaritalconflictgenderChildrensappraisals1994.pdf
Youtube Link : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFd_6ALd0TQ
(about the link : Personally, I disagree with this therapist 'blaming' her parents for something or the other, considering she had a great set of parents who showed 'warmth' toward her. Also there are controversies related to “Time-out's” as of today – May, 2011)

2.      Marital conflict – Impacts parenting skills/styles – leads to deficits in parenting – THIS impacts the child's adjustment. The child's adjustment could also be the result of what the behaviorist Bandura (1973) would say -  Modeling of the parents

Controversial indian examples that I love to state are the newspaper stories on the dysfunctional political like abusive father-like abusive son stories. (unable to comment on their authenticity, but here are the links : http://www.mid-day.com/news/2009/apr/120409-Pravin-Mahajan-exposes-Pramod-Mahajan-in-tell-all-book.htm
with an emphasis on : "Will my mother deny that Pramod once raised his hand to beat her and isn't Gopinath Munde (sister's husband) aware of this? "
followed by the much publicized Rahul Mahajan story http://www.ndtv.com/article/cities/rahul-mahajan-punched-kicked-and-dragged-me-by-hair-says-wife-dimpy-40901 with the spotlight on : “He punched, kicked and dragged me by hair”

            Its most interesting to draw hypothetical models by using these examples and much like a detective, or simply a gossip-hungry psychologist, keep a look out for more news articles, with more information on the family dynamics, and come up with a practice model, as I'd like to call it. Its also a good point of reference, while reading articles in journals. Makes the academic work more applicable in the actual clinical setting.

Word of advice : I like to look not just at syndromal diagnosis but mainly at symptomatic problems while creating my models. So, you need to figure out which is more applicable in what situation. Flexibility is best.

While reading the research its advisable to go in this order :
a. Look at all the methods used in the assessment procedures
b. Then, look at the empirical evidence that supports your hypothesis
c. Finally, focus on the processes involved or the mechanisms of causality or correlation
okay?

Here's an example :

Firstly, ALL parents DISAGREE on things. This means they all have differences of opinions. When do these differences qualify for 'conflict' that can indeed harm a child?
Some interactions on differences positively influence the child's schema's.

Not only is distinguishing the two important, but also studying the differential QUALITY of the interaction and its place in the larger child-parent relationship. 
Variations in ACTUAL communication, as well as children's perception of the same are both integral to our model.

“Mom and Dad have a GREAT BIG FIGHT” : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDOmagXum3I MUST WATCH TILL THE END

Measurement in therapy
 So, how would you measure parental conflict, if a client was to actually come to you?
-        Parent report Questionnaires
-        Child report Questionnaires
-        Daily records like the Marital Daily Record (please DO NOT think this is a 'thought diary', it in fact is a COMPLEX method for data collection, which can be read about in come of the sites as follows :
Time budget studies : http://drupal.timeuse.org/node/2360 or http://www.celf.ucla.edu/pages/workfamily.php or http://psidonline.isr.umich.edu/Guide/documents.aspx with complex data analysis. Read Larson and Varma (google their names) or Whiting and Whiting to see possible ethnographic accounts and controls for the same.  Also read about the Experience Sampling methods. 
Code : Tactics Used – Content of the Conflict – Own/partner/child's response
-        Observational Coding systems (Example: Facial expression, voice tone, verbal content, bodily gestures) 
-        Analogue/ Audio / Video methods
(If you want greater details on the above, kindly email me)

“Interparental Conflict in Context: Exploring Relations Between Parenting Processes and Children’s Conflict Appraisals” in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 39(2), 163–175, 2010
( I get a bit peeved by the way several studies focus solely on the mother and tend to minimize the fathers role or point out the study limitation as having not included fathers at all! )

Readings : Based on Hudson and Rapee

Using multiple methods will help in obtaining a comprehensive picture : Severity, frequency, tactics and content
Using multiple informants will also help with the same

Depressed Kya ?


Depression in the family

Interplay between Genetic, Biological , Contextual , Cognitive, Interpersonal factors in the family

Biopsychosocial Framework

Genes + parenting behaviors contribute to temperament
Temperament and parenting contribute to child's appraisal and response to stress
Appraisal then interacts with stress to produce depression

Genetics (Moderator of individuals responses to adversity)
Children of depressed parents are more likely to be depressed than normal controls
However this could be confounded by psychosocial factors like maladaptive parenting styles, marital dysfunction, and stress, which are also associated with parental psychopathology

(Page 229)
Twin studies:
Genetics accounts for 30-50% variance in child-reported depression.
Moderate role for genetic influences on individual differences

Adoption studies :
Genetics has a negligible effect !
Negligible role for genetic influences on individual differences
Early onset depression : more when there is a family history, and greater when this is associated with environmental contributions 
BOTH provide evidence for ENVIRONMENTAL role !

It is not the general qualities of some facet of the environment, but rather how these qualities influence an individual and how he or she interacts with this part of the environment across developmental stages.

Temperament and personality (Generally thought to be greatly genetic, although environment influences the same:  Therefore, certain types of personalities : Increased risk for depression)

Temperament defined as : “Constitutionally based individual differences in emotional, motor,  attentional reactivity and self-regulation”
Personality : “Tendency to behave , think and feel in certain consistent ways”

            B. Gender / Family Environment  (Moderators)
 


       A. Temperament                   C. Mood disorders (Depression) 

A – C (direct effect) – moderated by B
Positive and Negative emotionality

            B. Temperament (Moderator)


            A. Parenting                    C. Depression

Most probable model :
Contextual factors (Parent behaviors) + Children's temperaments = Increase/ Decrease the likelihood of children developing emotional & behavioral problems 


MEDIATORS

 

Temperament             Appraisals / Expectations / Coping             Mood disorders (Depression) 
 
Temperament             Parenting                                                   Mood disorders (Depression)


Conclusion :
(a) Temperament is transmitted partly genetically, although environment can influence it
(b) Temperament likely influences parenting behaviors
(c) Temperament influences family environment and children's outcomes

Parenting and Temperament = Risk Factors 

Family Environment – Depression
 

   FES =
  Parental Psychopathology
  Attachment
  Child rearing practices
  Communication
  Interaction patterns

Interesting thing is : Perceptions abut FES is JUST as predictive as actual FES in predicting depressive symptoms


                                    Mediator
Parenting                  Perception of FES                      Mood disorders (Depression)


Problem with observational studies :
Direction of effects is not disentangled
Ecological Validity ( how representative are lab studies of real interactions?)

2 important mediation questions :
(a) Is the relation between parental and child depression mediated by parenting ?
 

Parent depression                 Parenting behavior                     Child Depression

(b) Is the relation between parenting behaviors and child depression mediated by Negative Cognitions ?
 

Parent behaviors                   Negative Cognitions                  Child Depression

LIMITATIONS of STUDIES

Most studies are cross-sectional and not longitudinal (multiple time points)
Few studies have controlled for auto correlations
Few studies have tested the reverse direction models

Family effects on the course of depression : 5 course meal !

Onset, persistence, recurrence, course and maintenance of depression

Aspects of parent-child relationship: Maternal discipline


Depressed children : Described their parents as controlling, authoritarian , critical, rejecting, angry

Parenting Dimensions of rejection/ criticism ; acceptance/ warmth ; control/ intrusiveness
as well as perceived parenting dimensions of the above are significantly associated with depressive symptoms in the children

Same and multiple informant reports are BOTH important :)

Assessments :
Family Environment Scale
Childrens report of parents behavior
Five minute speech sample (Magena et al, 1986) to assess parental attitudes and EE
Observations during lab interaction

Parent perceptions seem to be stable over time

Predictors of depression :
Perception of family environment
Parental EE
Observed parental behaviors
Low family cohesion
(lower family support and greater conflict)

Dimensions of parenting through Observational data

 


Warmth            Hostility            Disciplining skills

Worse outcomes
Family stress
Low social competence
EE

Better outcomes
Increasing positive interactions
Reducing / Eliminating negative parenting

Child's own behavior : may exacerbate the problem


Dysfunctional parenting                  Negative cognitions    Depression
Mediation ?

( Cognitive Schema about self, others, world) : Children feeling 'acceptable' and loved


Attachment


Attachment

General Links:
Link  to buy educational CD's: http://www.davidsonfilms.com/package-deals?zenid=91l1immdm2rme538h447it10a1
- Konrad Lorenz (ethology) : “Critical periods & imprinting”
- John Bowlby : / attachment behavior : sucking, clinging, following, crying,
(International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 1958, 39, 350-373, “The nature of the child tie to his mother” Bowlby, J)
- Micheal Rutter : Bowlby's erstwhile critic (Maternal deprivation reassessed , Harmondsworth, M.Rutter, England : Penguin, 1972) : Imprinting is NOT irreversible. Rutter has done extensive research on this and much more and is currently investigating Dynamic Models of behavior
- Mary Ainsworths experimental paradigm : “The Strange Situation”
ref : Ainsworth, M.D.S., Blehar, M.C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation.
Ainsworth, M., & Bowlby, J. (1991). An ethological approach to personality development. American Psychologist, 46(4), 333 – 341

- Harlows Experiments 

Attachment theory

Think about :
1.      Individual Differences in attachment behaviors :
The Minnesota Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children began in 1975 and is currently in its 33rd year, AND, you ought to have read it, if not, its not too late : Alan Sroufe and colleagues followed a high-risk sample of children
Blasphemously summarized  : Several measures of early experience (go read the paper to see the 200 odd. measures), including attachment, predict the possibility of risks of various behavioral problems during the preschool, middle childhood and adolescent years of children born to teenage mothers.
More detailed :
Avoident attachment in infancy related to aggression in middle childhood, aggression and antisocial behavior in adolescence
Ambivalent attachment in infancy related to anxiety disorders (after controlling for maternal anxiety and child temperament) and depressive symptoms in adolescence
Secure attachment in infancy related to later resiliency, greater social competence and more adaptive reaction to stressors during adolescence (protective factor)
            Conclusion : Recipe for disaster  = Insecure attachment + family adversity      Later psychological difficulties / psychopathology
But but but, if a vulnerable child experiences a corrective attachment experience, he/she is able to revise his/her working model of attachment
            Conceptual Peg to help you remember how unstable life can get: Watch MTV's 16 and pregnant episodes

Importance in history-taking and therapy

History taking : Attachment (Easy-going, Slow-to-Warm, Difficult Temperaments and secure/Insecure avoidant/ Insecure resistant or ambivalent)
We are assessing socialization processes and these above assessments help in predicting future pathology (risk).
Externalizing and Internalizing behaviors, self-esteem predicted from infant attachment behaviors
(Meta analysis with effect size range : 0.17 to 0.54 with a mean of 0.29 ; ref - Van Ijzendoorn, Schuengel, & Bakermans-Kranenburg, 1999) 

Therapy (with case illustrations) : The Role of Attachment Functions in Psychotherapy, Jeremy Spiegel, Sally K. Severino, Nancy K. Morrison, The Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research 2000; 9:25–32

Attachment theory in adult psychiatry. Part 1: Conceptualizations, measurement and clinical research findings Advances in Psychiatric Treatment (2006) 12: 440-449

Attachment theory in adult psychiatry. Part 2: Importance to the therapeutic relationship
Advances in Psychiatric Treatment (2007) 13: 10-16.

Link : Attachment, Love and Flourishing relationships : http://www.sagepub.com/upm-data/11233_Chapter_13.pdf




2.      Methodologies for assessing the working models of attachment
Important to assess adults in relation to their earlier attachments.
Important research : Main & Goldwyn, 1998 for an empirical study (which are usually hard to find on this topic) of associations between attachment representations and later psychopathology in adolescence and adulthood, differential responses of individuals to supportive interventions, and the inter-generational transmission of resilience and vulnerability to stress.
Classify people as :
a. Avoident dismissing
b. Ambivalent-preoccupied
c. Unresolved/Disoriented
These classifications help predict psychopathology

What are the best pathologies to study attachment ?
Especially one's in which they have inter-personal problems such as Personality Disorders (B.P.D/A.S.P.D), Partner violence, Dissociation, Suicidal behaviors

Tools you may want to use to assess adult attachment : The Adult attachment interview

3.      Investigations of Attachment representations in children

Using Picture Response Procedures (adapted from Hansberg's Separation Anxiety Test – Klagsbrun-Bowlby modification)



4.      Contribution of attachment theory in explaining the inter-generational transmission of risk and resiliency

- This is a 'hot' topic for research. Must google 'inter-generational transmission' and read about parental transmission of vulnerability to psychopathology and resilience.

-        “Transmission gap” a word coined to indicate : A gap in our knowledge of the processes by which a mothers own attachment experience influences her infants attachment security.